Easily collect references, either one by one or in batches,
by clicking a button or importing a file, from an existing database, connected
websites or from publisher sites,
Manage their references, classify them, annotate them, tag
them, and export them,
Quote a reference within a text, from a classic office
automation tool or from Latex, and generate a bibliography, while adopting a
style (format) of presentation (chosen or imposed by a review).
There are dozens of tools of this type, free or paid, each
having developed some features more than others according to the needs of a
community, the operating system for which it works, the interest also of the
funders of their developments.
How to choose?
Since some LGRBs allow the creation of bibliographies or
collaborative collections and that this idea interests you, it is advisable to
inquire about the habits of your community, your laboratory or the members of
your research project and to choose the same tool. In the same vein, the fact
that the tool is also a form of social network can count if you want to expose
your bibliography to identify new collaborators.
Being able to annotate PDFs and even share notes with
collaborators is a feature that is generally appreciated. Some tools integrate
this functionality directly, others allow it by using a third-party PDF reader.
This is the case of Zotero for which there is also the possibility of using the
ZotFile application (which also allows a Zotero mobile operation).
Being free, free or paid can also be a criterion, as can the
limits of file storage space (to be distinguished from the limits in the number
of possible references). To work around the problem if you have a large library
of PDFs, you have to check if the tool allows outsourcing the storage by using
another service like Google Drive, Drop Box or Box. For Mendeley, it is
necessary to simply indicate a directory in the "cloud" as being an
"watched folder"; for Zotero, it will be a question of setting up a
WebDav server.
The operating system of your usual computer and the use of
LaTeX are also 2 fundamental criteria in your choices, like the compatibility
with your favorite browser, or the fact that the tool works entirely from the
web.
The existence of an application for tablets and smartphones
now counts more and more, even if it is especially here to be able to read and
annotate the documents rather than to quote them in a text.
The fact that the DirDoc IST Cluster can organize Zotero
trainings in your lab can also influence you. That said, if you want to opt for
another tool, or migrate from one tool to another, Le Lab can help you in your
approach.
There are comparators that can help you make your choice:
The dedicated page
of Wikipedia ,
The most complete
comparator is probably that made and updated by the library of the Technical
University of Munich,
The comparator of
the Imperial College ,
this post which
presents the advantages and disadvantages of Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote, Papers,
Ref Works,
·
A very detailed comparison of Zotero, Mendeley
and Docear (by Docear),
·
A comparative table of Endnote, Mendeley and
Zotero developed by MIT.
Migrate from one tool to another
If you want to change bibliographic reference management
tools, you will need to export your database and then re-import it into the new
environment. Check the Wikipedia page to identify the format (s) that are both
exported to your starting tool and imported by your new tool.
Do not hesitate to contact Le Lab for help with a major
migration operation.
Style
A style (output style) is used to format the rendering of a
reference call (examples: (Doe 2015) or (Doe, 2015) or a number referring to
the complete reference) and also the rendering of the complete bibliography at
the end of document. You can choose the one you like the most, but in most
cases it will be imposed by the magazine or conference to which you submit a
paper, for example.
Many tools include the ability to choose from a library of
styles that can be expanded by downloading a new style. Zotero proposes for
example to visualize the format of a style and to download it then to integrate
it to the tool, to see this page. They can be installed in other tools as they
are developed in a standard CSL format. EndNote also offers a catalog.
The cloud, synchronize
its data
Some tools only work from a computer, but more and more,
they are connected to a platform. This means that after creating an account, it
becomes possible to access via an Internet browser all its references and
sometimes even the full text. It is also what allows access from several
computers, his smartphone or his tablet. However, care must be taken to
synchronize the possible modifications made on a terminal so that they are
reflected in the opening of others.
EndNote allows you to synchronize your database with the
EndNote Web version embedded in the Web of Science bibliographic database.
Zotero provides online access to its library but the online
interface remains minimalist.
Mendeley also allows synchronization with an online account
that powers the user profile that allows you to take advantage of social
networking features.
No comments:
Post a Comment